Showing posts with label NJD. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NJD. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 7, 2025

Silent Conversations

Silent Conversations


I ought to write a silly poem
To pick my spirits up.
Just a bit of fun to show him
Something’s still in wits’ cup.

I promised not to go silent
Without his prodding on.
Within my grief, be defiant –
See what memories spawn.

Perhaps I am not yet ready
To do anything silly.
My thoughts, churning in an eddy,
Will not joke tranquilly.

But I do smile everyday
When he visits my mind.
He seems ready to come and play,
If I am so inclined.

I must fill in his dialogue
With words he may have said.
Is he my mental analog
Bouncing within my head?

But there’s his charm, there’s his question,
And there’s his certainty.
There to start another bull session
And fire my circuitry.

Monday, October 6, 2025

To My/Our Friend, Neil

To My/Our Friend, Neil


When you find a friend,
From yourself you unbend.
You learn to show more
Than you have shown before.
In your friend you see
More of who you can be.

I have such a friend –
What he gave will not end.
We shared very much
While alone or in touch.
He stays on my mind –
There, him, I still can find.

Sunday, March 7, 2021

Making It Real (Constitutionally)

Making It Real


We can talk of many concepts,
Debate and even write them down,
But they’re unreal if none accepts
They are rooted in the solid ground.

So it is for Democracy,
That implausible way to live.
In theory it seems near crazy,
To make our neighbors combative.

How simple to be told what’s right
By a wise and God named ruler.
Let the informed say when to fight
And not some offended dueler.

Might you trust in the guy next door
If the adequate rules were made?
To welcome some distant vote more
With careful foundation laid?

It is a challenge to be met
To change theory into nation.
We have not got it quite right yet,
But it’s not imagination.

When you can see and I agree,
The abstract gains reality.
The pure concept may never be,
But we don’t live in fantasy.

Sunday, February 21, 2021

THINKING, FAST and SLOW

THINKING, FAST and SLOW


Daniel Kahneman wrote a book
Into our brains to take a look.
I might believe his words too quick
If System 2 doesn’t get a kick.

Is “what you see is all there is”
Enough for you to solve the quiz?
Why wake your lazy, slower mate
When you do not need to debate?

We will recognize what is there
And give what is not little care.
We can still chew gum while we walk;
We guess and explain ‘til we balk.

Past our bias comes a creeping doubt;
We start to check our story out.
A bit of math, a few more facts,
Enough to let our minds relax.

Or perhaps more deeply we focus
In our flow of hocus-pocus.
Perhaps outside our little scheme
We recall the general theme.

But when into such thought we sink,
Econ or Human do we think?
Will rational sense make the choice,
Or will we hear emotion’s voice?

When later this book I recall,
I surely won’t remember all.
Perhaps I might read it again,
If I forget the mental strain.

My flaws, I guess, are good to know,
‘Though I wonder how much they show.
Likely more to your sight than mine
Around which they secretly entwine.

Thanks for the recommendation
About our mental gyration.
I may see the world as the same,
But now my mistakes have a name.

Sunday, July 7, 2013

Guide to Playing with Invisible, Silent, and/or Imaginary Friends


Guide to Playing with Invisible, Silent, and/or Imaginary Friends

Many of us have enough to do in keeping up to the demands of friendships amongst those we encounter each day. Those so socially engaged oft have little understanding for people who would further complicate their lives with interactions with folks who are not there. Nonetheless, there are still those who willingly (even preferably) seek the companionship of our more inconspicuous friends.

A lack of presence does not terminate our relations with the absent. The persons around us who have never engaged with the missing person might readily dismiss that apparent void as unnecessary to the reality of the moment. But our insubstantial friend peers out of our eyes and listens through our ears from his enthronement in our minds. As the fancy takes him, he may added commentary and interpretation that may have otherwise passed unnoticed by us. Perhaps there are some we encounter whose quick mental impressions we can smooth out of the wrinkles of our brains, but once we have allowed a friend to take up residence for any time, we will forever find his footprints scattered throughout our domes. Sometimes we allow our enemies to stomp around under there too.

What should we do with these unevictible absentee lodgers? Some may chose to wall them up behind bricks of neglect and forgetfulness, writing off those rooms as irrecoverable losses; we use so little of our brain capacity that the depletion seems slight. Some learn to double-bunk (and more) our guests into composite memories from which the component entities can rarely be separated again (especially useful for multiple exes, I hear in country music). But I would suggest that the best approach is to be a courteous host and allow your guests to have their fun. You too will benefit if you follow the proper guidelines.

First, you should probably learn to distinguish the characteristics of your relation with your cerebral comrade. Friendships start, pause, and even end in many manners, with more variety than can ever be catalogued. I will offer here three simple bins into which to sort your non-apparent guests, but readily admit you may find them too restrictive, non-exclusive, or totally unnecessary. There are:

  • Invisible friends - It may not have been so long since you have seen your friend that you no longer know what he looks like. But the people around you nowadays do not share your memory of the invisible friend. This is not somebody they know and, if they accept your avowal for his existence, they do so as faith in you, not in your friend.
  • Silent friends – There is little to no fresh exchange with the silent friend. For a deceased friend, there may be scant prospect for any new input. Nonetheless, the wellspring of memories of a silent friend may provide endless re-runs and even revised editions.
  • Imaginary friends – A simple lack of reality does not engender an imaginary friend in our minds. Many real people whom we have never met have been subject of enough tales that our imagination has constructed from them a persona for us to know (and befriend). Oh, yes, there are certainly imaginary friends who are totally fictional creations, but it is our ability to animate them in our brains that permitted our friendships to blossom.

Some suggestions to do:

To the degree that you share yourself, share your otherwise hidden friends. They are part of you now.

Listen to your friends. Ask them for assistance and amusement. Remember the good times. Remember the lessons learned and the techniques and thinking employed to learn them. So often you did these things together and you can replay them again (with variation) if you allow it.

Be prepared to hear something new from your friends. They are reacting to your new experiences, even with their old eyes, ears, and words. They will enliven your thoughts and provide new viewpoints when you allow their characters the chance to speak within the brain you share.

Respect your friends, but do not idolize them. It is okay to disagree with them (and they with you) in your thoughts just as you might in person. They are your friends, remember?

Maybe you should not:

Talk aloud to your friends when other persons are present. If you feel it is necessary to do so, please at least introduce them to the people in the room.

Close yourself off to the possibility of their return. Do not become so enraptured with your memories of a friend that you will dismiss an opportunity to extend your memories with fresh contact. Even the long-gone friend (prominent amongst the Silents) may have new material discovered by you or others. Sequels and remakes do occur and sometimes live up to or improve upon the original; if nothing else, they remind you of the original.

Allow them to take over. Hey, this is your psyche and your life. They have their own body (or book, or mythical beast) to inhabit. Let them talk to you, but draw the line when they attempt to possess you entirely. Friendship has its limits, doesn't it?

The friendships that go into making us who we are should be treasured even as they grow old and distant. Give them some attention and they will remain shiny, able to reflect back to you that which you store within. Oh, sure, some will have the warps and distortions of a funhouse mirror, but that is part of the fun of life too.

Sunday, September 16, 2012

Three Men in a Tub Redux


Three Men in a Tub Redux


Neil and Doug slept too late and the bus departed without them.
That missed Earth Day trip starts this tale and triggers this poem.
Perhaps you have heard the story all you want, so hide your eyes,
For here again is the adventure of a small boat and three Tech guys.

Too late for the bus but awake too early, this pair to the City does go
To lower Manhattan at Saturday's dawn when city life is slow.
Through the unpeopled streets they walk and explore;
Only garbage and delivery trucks replace the horde's roar.

Wall Street is tall and windswept, echoing a faint silence,
And Trinity Church in its glory houses an absent presence.
Down streets and across, the grid leads them around and about
Until their path at the Battery Park waterfront peeks out.

The sun is now up through a light fog, toasting the air,
And the residents appear, shifting from here to elsewhere.
Neil and Doug pause to scan the river, its traffic and flow,
When behold, in a small sailboat, it is Diego.

Climb aboard, he offers, and let's share this morning ride.
He manuevers the tiny craft to pull up to the wharfside.
Neil and Doug look down at the drop to the water,
Then taking the plunge, they join the intrepid boater.

The bold little craft swings out to challenge the river's tide
Which washes downstream against the sail's force applied.
Our trio is swept forth, down, out, and into the harbor;
Progress resisted, windpower overwhelmed, they flounder.

We need a repair, says Diego, looking over the boat's stern,
So to the north shore of a small nearby island they turn.
I will make the fix, he says, while you look around.
So Doug and Neil scramble out and onto the ground.

Hey, look, there are buildings. Wonder where we are.
Let's wander to check it out; it is not very far.
So, over they stroll and enter by a back door
Into ages of litter and dust on the floor.

The corridors pass by large rooms with glass half walls,
Open for inspection by everyone patrolling the halls.
Abandoned in pieces, the rooms' stories are muted,
And, by curiosity, farther in, the adventurers are guided.

The hallways brighten as they enter the building main
And emerge at a dock where a half sunken ferry was lain.
Two men are at work feeding wood into a fire
When they spot the interlopers and respond with ire. 
 
Whats you boys doing here, yelled the little man in the hat,
This here U.S. Guvment property, and youse gotta scat.
Joining his partner, the large man moves the axe to his shoulder
And, for our young men, the air grows suddenly colder.

Under guard, four abreast, they march back whence they came
While little man lambasts them with abuse and shame.
At Doug's side, We ought to break your legs, he says.
The goliath grunts and Neil jumps a foot sideways.

Despite threat and dread, back to where the boat is moored,
They load in with Diego and push off with a broken board.
There are not many who ever can match their claim
That expelled from Ellis Island is now part of their fame.

The battle against the river once more they renew
But their efforts and plans again go askew.
They cross east to discover at Governors Island they arrive,
The Coast Guard headquarters with its docked fleet of five.

Their curiosity was untamed by their Ellis Island escape,
So in amongst the cutters they sail and wide-eyed gape.
Surrounded by walls of steel out of the water erected
The sail goes limp for all winds are deflected.

But the windlocked lads have gained the needed tool,
That broken old board, now a paddle in the tranquil pool.
With many a stroke, they turn themselves about
And with indeed many more, they eventually get out.

The sun has grown high and the tide has at last turned;
To get to Hoboken is top priority for all here concerned.
A zigzag course across the Hudson's unassisted flow
Should now be possible although still slow.

So off to the west at a hope filled angle they sail
And, finally, progress eases up on their travail.
They approach the Jersey side and tack to the east
And their eagerness for home is greatly increased.

But Diego is not happy with the rudder's performance,
As he peers over the back and takes another glance.
His fix has loosened; he needs to do it again,
So he passes forward a small cable to straighten.

With a small twist here and a bend or two there,
Neil gets the cable ready for the repair.
Diego leans over to rethread the rudder
With confidence and skill and maybe a mutter.

The repair continues as New York side grows nearer;
Doug sees faces onshore and hopes soon for a steerer.
Diego sits up at his helmsman position and with a snap,
It is off to New Jersey, hopping a passing ship's whitecap.

In midriver, Diego decides the repair is not quite right,
And again requests the cable reshaping to correct the slight.
From Neil, another twist and another couple more bends,
And the cable back to Diego to make more amends.

Diego resumes his midcruise repairs, when Oops he does utter
As overboard to the river's bottom goes that part of the rudder.
All is not lost, says resourceful Diego to calm his crew,
We just need a bit of string, like a lace from a shoe.

Doug at his pair of “modern” plastic loafers does look,
While Neil, for a loose string, the plug in the hull mistook.
With a quick little tug before anyone can stop him,
He retrieves this bit of cord, so crucial yet slim.

Oh, what a surprise! A trinkle of water starts to come in
And it is then that Neil announces he cannot swim.
In the boat are two lifejackets; Diego wears one.
Getting Neil into the other is the next course of action.

The plug once pulled afloat will never return,
So, to its new duty, it goes over the stern.
Doug's Korfam shoes are now buckets to bail
As over the sides the incoming water they flail.

The piers of Jersey City are a welcoming sight;
When the boat reaches, to them it's steered tight.
Skirting the shore, poking in and out and around,
The crew creeps back to Hoboken's safe ground.

Neil leaps from the vessel and plants a kiss on the ramp,
Relieved to the utmost to be saved from a fate too damp.
Life on land is celebrated with a trip to Washington Street
With the most wonderful Cuban meal they ever will eat.

Sunday, August 12, 2012

Who Else Would I Be, Dr. Maslow?


Who Else Would I Be, Dr. Maslow?


My thoughts, so seems, scaled a pyramid
To decide to do the things I did.
Each day I act within its shade,
As my wants and desires are weighed.

Physical needs are first to choose
With control that none can refuse.
Feed me, clothe me, and keep me warm,
Protect my vital, creature form.

But once my body rests at ease,
Fears for safety my mind will tease.
Save for later, and watch my steps,
Stay out of rain, avoid all streps.

Yet when those fears are reassured,
To other’s company I am lured.
To love, be loved, to give and get,
To belong, to owe or hold a debt.

I may linger in these thoughts long,
Building my links both wide and strong.
But more remains for me to want,
As to me of me I may vaunt.

Your praise and my pride blend a mix,
Confident, to set out to fix
All I am for all that can be,
To bring to life the inner me.

Who is this me who waits in queue
For all other needs to quell ado?
And who is real in other eyes
When I do not self-actualize?

A noble peak was placed atop
The mount for our most elite crop.
If no peek there I ever see,
You say I have never been me?

------------------------------------

An Alternate Arrangement of Maslow Needs



We react to our perceived needs.  All our needs areas are continually "shouting out" their wants and suggestions for what we should do.  As individuals, we might differ in the relative strengths with which they broadcast their demands into our brains.  But as we act to fulfill these needs, we develop remoteness from an imperative to listen further.  In this illustration, the needs sphere moves away from our inner decision appartus and its shouts fade like sound (inverse squared) traveling a greater distance.  We may also fatigue from repetitively hearing demands we cannot (or at least do  not) met and develop an acclimation that has the same distancing effect.  Or we may habituate to some demands as a sort of meaningless "white noise" as we find we so seldom respond to them.  But all the needs area are sending messages constantly, whether faintly or loudly perceived.  We are not always able to met all those needs in the moment, but we will tend to act to satisfy as many as we can, relegating others to the waiting list (or a later repeat request).  Thus, the hungry man, with a choice of door A to eat a doughnut in soltitude and door B to share a sandwich with a friend, might be expected more frequently to chose door B.  And the hungry parent might fetch his portion of the shared sandwich and give it to his child (or to a stranger's child acting on the faint calls from hypothesized nobility of the Maslow unrealized self).

Sunday, June 3, 2012

The Old Man and the Young Man


The Old Man and the Young Man


dedicated to Neil Dorans who reminded me of the young man within

Last night, in the playground of my thought,
I met myself strolling on the walk.
We both came pondering puzzles we fought,
But paused in recognition to talk.

Say, old man, do you remember me?”
I asked the grey-bearded one.
Oh, do you still dream of what you will be?”
I responded to the young gun.

Am I happy, am I famous;
Have I lived the life I want?
True to my ideals or aimless,
Off course, and nonchalant?

I wish to grow and know myself,
To see a better world,
To add knowledge to mankind's shelf,
To see peace's flag unfurled.

Family and friends of whom I care
Are scheduled in my plan.
Achievement and fun, plenty to share,
As I am you, old man.”

I have not changed who you become,
Though choice and chance prevail.
I am happy to want what did come,
To have survived life's travail.

And yet, not all goes as planned,
And our chosen paths diverge.
Life does not bend to youth's command,
And unseen obstacles emerge.

My lad, be prepared to be surprised,
More and less are yet to come.
Allow ourselves to be advised
By experience-acquired wisdom.”

I looked upon me and I looked back,
Disbelief filled all our eyes.
My life to be I cannot hijack,
Nor life that was likewise.

Sunday, April 1, 2012

Practically a Solution


Practically A Solution

For Ameliorating the Discord Inherent in a Society of Economic Inequality


In recent months, before winter and sanitary needs set in, a stroll in a familiar park was disrupted or totally prevented in cities and towns throughout our nations (and others) by protesting occupiers of those spaces. By self-proclamation, they represented the economically lower 99% of Americans disproportionally removed from the nation’s financial wealth, as embodied in investments principally owned by the other 1%. While this 1% owns 43% of the interest in corporations (and the next 19% owns another 50%), the vast majority of Americans have only a small slice of control over corporate actions which define their jobs, income, goods and services to purchase, and general economic world in which they live.

At the beginning of the 19th century, there were only 300 corporations in America (and only eight were in manufacturing). Now, a bit over 200 years later, there are nearly 6 million of these legal fictions allowed to act with the privileges and obligations granted to a “person” under civil law. With the ability to gather the resources and powers of many “natural” people into a single “corporate person”, these entities conduct vital business in our society in a coordinated and self-perpetuating manner beyond the scope of mere human individuals.

But whether with fear, resentment, and/or envy, we are reacting to the corporate Pinocchios not only escaping the control of their human creators, but grasping the strings to dictate the stage and the play of our human drama. Their collective lobbying and legal actions over the last two centuries have extended their privileges seemingly beyond those of natural citizens while avoiding, or at least diminishing, the extension of their obligations. It is right that they have done so, for their fiduciary responsibility required them to gain value and better advantage for themselves (and thus, indirectly, for their owners). It is what made (and still makes) America grow. But both the owning and non-owning human citizens of America now share their relative disadvantage to our fellow corporate citizens.

Recently I was asked by a learned friend if I might apply my modest skills of research and analysis to examine this issue. The nature of the situation has been studied and discoursed upon by many before me, both scientifically and emotionally. For somebody to come forward with a plan to balance the dynamic needs of an economy for investment of otherwise unencumbered funds and the incentives of prosperity to drive productivity and progress with the egalitarian desire for all society members to participate contentedly in our shared community would be worthy of universal praise. Humbly, I present such a plan herein, not for fame, but for the simple benefit of restoring our American unity and pride.

While the reason it has been overlooked heretofore is unclear to me, the solution is obvious. Natural persons need to become corporations. Humanity has run its course as a basis for society and its exchanges.

My fair reader may ask, how does the flesh and soul of our humanity holds us back from the benefits of the artificial embodiment of corporations?

Mortality. Unburdened from the frailty of flesh, the corporation is prepared to be immortal. While in actual fact an incident of unfavorable cash flow can be as lethal to a corporation as excessive loss in blood flow, the lifetime of a corporation is independent from those of its mortal owners (and employees).

Liability. Bound by personal responsibility, humans have the consequences of their actions able to tap into (and deplete) all their available resources for recompense, whether related to the actions or not. Corporations limit the liability felt by its owners to only those resources invested in the corporate enterprise. Buy a million dollars of stock – risk a million dollar loss, but never a larger one.

Criminality. While corporations are persons of legal standing, corporations lack the body to serve the time. Even the managers of corporations seem rarely to serve punishments for the “white collar” criminal misbehavior and malfeasance; they are more often seen to be rewarded with retention bonuses and stock options for their clever (albeit failed) stratagems to test the bounds on the behalf of the corporation. Owners not employed by the corporation are clear of personal risk of such charges, bearing only (limited) financial risk. The corporation picks up the tab for any penalties and changes its practices to avoid (being caught) committing such offenses again.

Taxation. The corporate citizen pays its taxes. But the rules for income and gains versus expenses and losses recognize the long term nature of the corporation and its needs to perpetuate, grow, and even thrive beyond a mere tax season. A person receiving $10,000 in income and spending $5,000 to feed and clothe the demanding body required to earn that income is still liable for taxation on the full $10,000. But a corporation selling $10,000 of goods to produce its income and spending $8,000 for raw materials, equipment, and labor (by self-clothed/-fed employees) to manufacture and deliver the goods has tax exposure merely on the net profit of $2000. The allowable necessities of human life are limited to standard and well-defined itemized deductions, while the necessities to conduct business life are less confined in definition and volume in their cost subtractions. At the federal level, taxable income of large multi-billion dollar corporations are treated essentially equal in tax rates (34-35%) as all but the smallest corporations (net income less than $335,000) without the disincentive of progressive taxation to limit their entrepreneurship, growth, and contribution to the societal economy.

Sexuality and Sensuality. Lacking anatomical and metabolic components, Lust drops out of the cardinal sins that tempt and drive corporations. While the same may not be possible to say for its human owners and employees, the goals and motives for corporate actions are not thrown into disarray by hormonal surges. Similarly, the corporation does not fall prey to the carnal whims of hunger, thirst, nor pain.

Morality and Religion. The moral duties of the corporation are defined by the fiduciary trusts in its founding charter. In the very many cases of “for profit” corporations, that chief responsibility is to manage the owners’ investments to maximize financial return. All corporations must act within the rules of Law, but are not generally bound by the diverse sets of non-secular rights and wrongs of our many competing religions. Corporations derive their moral code from that which can be agreed upon by all religions and non-religions, not their differences. That and what their accountants and market research tell them.

How does our society convert humanity into negotiable corporate commodity?

One of the greatest beauties of the proposal offered here is that its requirements for implementation have already been enacted in our American jurisprudence. The replacement of the word “person” with “corporation” in our legal and constitutional documents is established law under the prevailing interpretation of the due process of the Fourteenth Amendment. The simple completion of the process from an implicit application of our laws to an explicit literal statement in the laws is a mere find-and-replace operation away. Any word processing software on the market can achieve this task. It is but a mild additional complexity to search for “people”, “man” and “men” (“woman” and “women” if such exist) to perform similar substituting edits.

As our Declaration of Independence proclaims, all corporations are created equal and endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights (life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness (profit)). To secure these rights, governments are instituted amongst corporations, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed (corporations).

While initially people of all ages will need to file their incorporation documents to ensure their rights under the United States of America Inc., henceforth the process of citizenship would commence at birth (or as the final step of naturalization – hereafter called “citizen acquisition mergers”). Following a two-week investigation and review period triggered by the IPO filing for the newborn, the parent corporations will issue the standard (and universally equal at creation) one thousand shares in the new incorporation. Such issuing corporations may elect to retain full or partial ownership in their progeny under market rules, but, after standard processing fees and commissions, they would share equally (or as stipulated in a procreation contractual agreement between the parties) in the net proceeds of the sale. Such funds as are so raised (supplemented as decided in subsequent transactions) should be prudently managed to ensure the rearing of the new corporate resource to a productive and autonomous adult entity.

At the attainment of adulthood, the shares in an individual corporation shall be doubled (to two thousand, or more as necessary to accommodate earlier stock splits and allowed subsequent issuances) with the new half assigned to the newly matured entity. Again, the new owner may elect to retain all, part, or none of these new shares dependent of its own desires and decisions related to the prevailing free market value at that time. It would be common practice for most adult individuals to retain at least partial ownership in themselves to allow for some future free will.

Thus, no individual will lack value and presence in the affairs and conduct of business in America.

What advantages will society and civilization gain by converting to a corporate basis?

Commodity. Even the poorer citizens will have something valuable of their own. While all human resources will not be of equal total value, the marketplace will ensure a merit-based evaluation of their portfolio.

Government. The derivation of legislative, executive, and judicial powers of the government from corporations will eliminate the often messy process of elections by the populace. While the tabulation of corporate opinion may still be more efficiently implemented with term-selected officers mandated with the management duties to make and enforce intercorporate laws, the politics of such selections would be streamlined to simple concensus amongst shareholders deciding each corporate vote. Most individuals may not even be troubled to express their opinions with their proxies having been assigned on controlling ownership by holding companies and other corporations.

Incarceration. With the shielding of personal responsibility under corporate ownership, the practice of imprisonment of offenders will disappear (or at least greatly diminish). This will be a huge cost savings in America where more than one person out of every two hundred adults is residing in our jails and prisons on the average day. The switch to civil penalties instead of criminal-corporeal punishment will not only eliminate these expenditures, but also develop a robust source of revenues for the operations of our federal, state, and local governments.

Civil Agreement. The existing law covering merger, acquisition, and divestiture will become the basis for the often emotionally entangled relationships between humans. Parenthood, marriage, and divorce are the most obviously improved under properly drawn contractual agreements. Freed of overriding personal issues of gender, religion, age, race, etc., corporate mergers will allow all unions considered in the best interest of the owners to be negotiated and implemented (with customized clauses and riders as agreed by the parties).

Perhaps less obviously, but certainly as dramatically, affected are employment relations. The daily value of a human resource's production is a necessary commodity for which an employer must compete. Without contractually granted rights to draw upon these resources, the employer has no employees. Other organizations seeking membership and contributions (churchs, charities, even leisure/recreation clubs) will also be in the bidding for favorable agreements with the owners of these resources.

Reinvestment. There has been considerable controversy and agitation over inheritance following the demise of persons. The heirs of the deceased feel entitled to the fruits of his/her lifetime of accumulation and often argue (or at least complain) about a division of assets based on the capricious “will” left behind. But under corporate ownership rules, the division of the assets retained by the deceased are dictated clearly in the proportional shares of ownership in that individual. Whereas individuals enter into the incorporation of USA Inc with one thousand shares, their departure (and revocation of corporate charter and its associated privileges) should similarly, in balance, require an absorption of one thousand shares at their current market value at time of death by the government (to control inflationary pressure due to overissuance of stock in the total market). The reinvestment of value is thus ensured into both the private and public sectors of the economy.

Do we need to give up our humanity to achieve peaceful accord in our society?

There may be some who argue that tweaks of the status quo are all that is required to calm the tensions and discord we are experiencing. It is difficult to share their enthusiasm and belief after witnessing the gridlock and morass that has stymied past efforts. Who can still hold hope that the government will enforce the existing regulations, that industries will calculate favorably the profitability of self-policed restraint, or that corporate chartering will return to a requirement of public good as one of the fundamental fiduciary duties in equal or greater importance to profits? Does anyone expect that human managers of faceless corporations will truly be held to account to the public for the subversion and destruction of our economy in the pursuit of corporate profits? What new regulations can be promulgated without funding or staff to enforce that will divert the corporate world from its well-trodden, although ill-advised, paths?

I offer this adaption of our society without prospect for personal gain on my part. My wife and I are neither impoverished nor wealthy under the current system and should have no more political nor economic power as two small corporations amongst 325 million than are afforded to us now.