Showing posts with label voting. Show all posts
Showing posts with label voting. Show all posts

Friday, March 26, 2021

Georgia in the News

Georgia in the News

(tune: Georgia on My Mind (Hoagy Carmichael))


Georgia, Georgia
Oh, what they do.
Those voting rules there
Keep Georgia in the news.

I said Georgia, Georgia,
What can you do?
It seems mighty clear
You do not like it Blue.

Other folks reach out to vote -
Democracy they promote,
Still in grasping hope you wrote
The rules to favor you.

I said Georgia, Oh Georgia,
No peace I find
Those voting rules there
Keep Georgia on my mind.

Swinging in America

Swinging in America

(tune: Swinging on a Star)


Would you like to shoot an AR,
Blow away your prey from afar,
And be scarier than you are?
Or would you rather have the vote?

The vote is a right of adult citizenship
‘Though a right many seem to skip.
Our votes should decide who our leaders are,
Although they often follow their own star.
And by the way, if the news you do not note,
They may be now stealing your vote.

Or would you like to shoot an AR,
Blow away your prey from afar,
And be scarier than you are?
Or would you rather have your health?

Healthcare is an issue most of us take to heart,
A reason from our money we part.
We want relief from injury and disease
But who can believe those drug and doctor’s fees?
If you have insurance or lots of wealth
Maybe you can afford your health.

Or would you like to shoot an AR,
Blow away your prey from afar,
And be scarier than you are?
Or would you rather have safety?

Safety is a commodity in short supply,
Telling the good from the bad guy.
Is each for himself the best way to go
Or does control make security grow?
But if sight of policemen makes you chafe,
You may never feel truly safe.

And all the answers aren’t at hand
And not all march to the same band.
So you see it’s all up to us
Can we be better than we are?

Or do we each need our own AR?

Sunday, October 20, 2013

The Freedom to Vote


The Freedom to Vote

The problem with absolute Freedom is how seldom one truly gets to exercise it. To be free is to be untethered to anything and unfettered of any restraint. When does that ever happen!?

Freedom, on a more practical level, does not permit us to do everything we can, but defines a range in which we may act. Some restraints are self-imposed, based on our own sense of morality, risks, values, and logic. But many limitations are established by agreements we have with the people around us. Those choices which we allow to others are the same freedoms of which we have the expectation to possess ourselves.

Such is the freedom to vote. If my vote is to have value then so must yours under the same qualifications. In demanding my right to vote, I am conceding my inability to make the decision alone. I am buying into the agreed process for how the votes will be treated to arrive at a decision and thus implicitly agreeing to the decision as binding on me, irrespective of how I vote. Such a “freedom to vote” is costly purchased in restraints upon my other actions, especially it seems, when that vote goes against me.

True “Freedom” would be not to need to yield my actions to the opinions of others in the decision to be made. Universal Freedom would be the anarchy of everyone governed by their own decision, unable to affect or to be affected by another person’s actions. Hermits might experience such, but not those of us living amongst others.
Free” societies are not built to strengthen Freedom, but to harness its power of desire beyond self-interest into cooperative efforts and protections. The Declaration of Independence makes this point in its “self-evident truths”:
  • that all men are created equal,
  • that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness
  • that to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,
These are truths which are universal (equal in all people) and not statements about our differences (in health, wealth, beauty, intelligence, citizenship, etc). There is a set of naturally provided (endowed) attributes that cannot be separated from the person to be given to another (unalienable). One person’s Life (organic being), Liberty (choices) or Pursuit of Happiness (desires) cannot be removed and placed in another person. And yet, these attributes are not secure. Although they cannot be transferred to another, they may be denied without the security of society (Government) and specifically a society whose agreements (rules of governance) are based on the protection of equal and shared rights being the purpose of that society. A Society that is “destructive to these ends” must be altered or abolished, according to the Declaration of Independence, in favor of another “most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness”. There is still no certainty of these goals ensured by this fundamental document of our American society, only best efforts.
To secure = “to make (something) safe by guarding or protecting it”; “to make (something) certain”; “to put (something) in a place or position so that it will not move”. Particularly, this last definition describes the relationship between Security and the Freedom it secures. In order to be secure, restrictions are placed on the range of motion (action) of the object. It is “tied down for its own safety”. Security and Freedom are opposing forces and it is the “consent of the governed” which decides the balance.
And thus, as a society, we vote, a compromise in every decision made between our individual Freedom and the Security of having any Freedom.


Sunday, November 4, 2012

The Obligation of Choice

THE OBLIGATION OF CHOICE

At first glance, I thought all the inhabitants had the same bilaterally hued, two-toned colorations.  The black and white patterns split down the center on both their clothing and their flesh.

“Where am I?” was my first query.


Two representatives separated themselves from the crowd and approached me. “Welcome to Volitio,” said one vigorously. “Will you be leaving soon?” asked the other as eagerly.


“Volitio; well, I guess I am truly lost. Can you help me get my bearings? I do not even remember leaving my bed. Which hemisphere is this?”

“North,” replied the greeting, and somewhat shorter, one. “West,” said the taller one.

“May I address you by name? I am Lemuel.”

“You may call me Emil, but my compatriot may not be so ready for such cordiality yet.” The short man extended his hand which I clasped briefly.

“If it will move this along, I am Horace, and you may so address me,” begrudged the taller man. Horace's hands remained at his sides.

“Oh, no,” interjected Emil, “do not feel any haste. Please visit if you have the time.”

“Well,” I said, eying Horace who obviously felt less accomodating, “I would enjoy knowing more about Volitio and its people, since I have been plunked down here somehow. I am sure I will be going back to my own home by the same mysterious method very soon,” I tried to reassure Horace.

“Let's entertain your curiosity and ours then for what time has been granted us. Would you come with us to the assembly hall where we can rest and get out of the sun?” Emil turned to escort me down the street to the nearby building.

“The picnic yard would allow more to participate if we must,” suggested Horace. He turned towards the park in front of the building.

“The hall,” said Emil, showing the first edges of unpleasantness since my arrival.

“The yard,” insisted Horace adamantly. The crowd began to move, dividing into two factions behind Emil and Horace. That was when I first noted the right-white, left-black pattern of Emil (and his supporters) and the right-black, left-white arrangement in Horace's group. And my plaid pajamas with their assortment of blue, yellow, red, and green threads.

I felt the hairs on my neck rise with the expectation of tension. But instead of further wrangling and argument, the groups formed into orderly ranks and files and promptly counted their numbers. Horace's group was larger and those from both factions who wished to continue our meeting moved into the park, quickly intermingling again until their difference was obscured from my notice.

“That was a very impressive display of democracy, Emil,” I commented as I followed him to a small pavilion in the front of the park.

“We will have the next majority,” he assured me. “Those Lefts so often vote themselves into situations they lose interest in pursuing. Happens to us Rights also. Winning takes persistence and timing. Look at all those Lefts leaving now that the Park is chosen.” Looking at Emil then, I recognizes his reference to which side was White in his and Horace's factions.

“Are Volitians naturally pigmented with bilaterally opposite colors?”

“No. It is a choice – we are born with as blank a skin as you have and just as naked. But our children learn to chose a side.” We had reached the low platform where Horace awaited us.

“You will sit in the middle,” Horace said as he lead me to a row of chairs. Emil and Horace sat with their White sides towards me (Emil (a Right) on my left, Horace (a Left) on my right).

“So, stranger, as we see from your childish appearance, you have much to learn,” began Horace. “We will forebear you this opportunity to make up your mind. What do you need to know?"

Although it had been many a year since anyone called me a youngster, I asked politely, “How do you choose to be a Right or a Left?”

“We are taught what is correct by our families, friends, and communities,” explained Emil. “We recognize what we believe in whom we believe.”

“So, do all Right parents have Right children and Lefts have Left?”

“No. Even spouses might not be of the same persuasion. My wife is a Right, while I am a Left,” Horace said. “Two of our grown offspring are Rights and one is a Left. We still have one Undecided at home.”

“And if you changed your mind later in life, how do you change your Side?”

“Why would you change? What is right today is Right tomorrow,” Emil exclaimed.

“And what is left today will still be Left tomorrow,” agreed Horace.

“It seems that sometimes you both agree. Is that true or are you defined by what the ones are not?”

“There are things that are true when viewed from any direction,” Horace declared. “It is our common belief in majority rule that allows our society to decide. We Lefts believe it is equitable, the Rights believe it is efficient, but the outcome is the same.”

“There is nothing wrong with disagreement, only with being disagreeable,” Emil smiled, looking across at Horace.

“Courtesy is too often a mere disguise for dishonesty,” Horace replied, speaking more to Emil than me.

“More is achieved in harmony than in discord,” replied Emil.

“And more of value is built from truth than from disillusion,” Horace countered.

As the men on each side of me started to ignore me, I scanned the audience. They also seemed to have lost interest in my presence and begun discussions amongst themselves. Small groups formed. I watched as topics began, sides stated, and decisions made in a choreography of small votes.  The lopsided kaleidoscopic images of their democracy in action whirled in my mind.  Drowsily, I closed my eyes.

Awaking in my bed, Volitio had faded.  Have I chosen my one side for life?